Saroj Goyal v. Rupinder Singh Josh & ANR

296-2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2214 of 2014 Date of decision : 09.02.2023 Saroj Goyal ....Petitioners

Versus

Rupinder Singh Josh and another

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present :

None for the petitioner.

Mr. P.P.S. Tung, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Inderpreet S. Kang, Asstt. Advocate General, Punjab. PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) Mr. Tung appearing for respondent No.1 submits that the amount as claimed in the writ petition already stands paid and thus the present COCP will not survive.

None has come present on behalf of the petitioner. Resultantly, the present contempt petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.

However, liberty is granted to the petitioner. In case she finds that the aforesaid statement is wrong she may file application for revival of the contempt petition.

February 09, 2023 (PANKAJ JAIN) Dpr JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR 2023.02.24 16:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document