Bhupinder Singh v. H.P Singh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH COCP No.2240 of 2014 Date of decision: 16.05.2017 Bhupinder Singh ..Petitioner

Versus

Sh. H.P. Singh ..Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY

Present:

Ms. Alka Chatrath, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Avin Sandhu, Advocate for Mr. Amit Aggarwal, Advocate for the respondent.

*** Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the claim of the petitioner has been considered and he has been granted the pay-scale, which has been given to other Teachers whereas learned counsel for the petitioner submits that juniors to the petitioner are getting higher pay scale. Since only direction was there to consider the case of the petitioner for grant of pay-scale as admissible to the Teachers, who have been regularly recruited to the post and the same has been granted, nothing survives in the present contempt petition and the same is disposed of accordingly. Nothing has been mentioned in the order as to whether the petitioner is entitled for pay-scale, which has been granted to other similarly situated persons, who are juniors to him.

However, in case, the petitioner is still aggrieved in any Neetu Rani 2017.05.26 11:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

COCP No.2240 of 2014 manner, he is at liberty to move representation to the concerned authority within a period of one month and in case, any such representation is moved, the respondent is directed to pass order on the representation within a period of two months thereafter.

16.05.2017 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) neetu JUDGE √ Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No √ Whether Reportable Yes/No Neetu Rani 2017.05.26 11:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh