Jai Parkash v. State Of Haryana And Others

Sr. No. 108

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No. 445-2021(O&M) Date of Decision: 11.01.2021 Jai Parkash

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA Present :

Mr.Prateek Rathee, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Ms.Mamta Talwar, DAG, Haryana.

(Presence marked through video conference).

ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL) Petition herein is under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondent No.2 to perform his duty by passing a final order on the regular inquiry report dated 16.11.2020 (Annexure P-4).

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Deputy Commissioner Gurugram was directed on 16.08.2020 to get the enquiry completed and to take a final view in the matter within a period of two months. However, even after a lapse of more than four months, no final decision has been taken by him on the inquiry report dated 16.11.2020 submitted by Additional Deputy Commissioner. Hence, the present writ petition.

3.

Notice of motion.

4.

Ms. Mamta Talwar, DAG, Haryana who has joined proceedings on service of advance copy of the petition appears and accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State of Haryana.

SHALINI BHATIA 2021.01.11 21:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

5.

Given the nature of order being passed, there is no necessity to seek return by any of the respondents, as no proceedings and/or pleadings are required.

6.

Without commenting anything on the merits of the case, writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to pass a speaking order on the inquiry report, as expeditiously as possible, but not later than 6 weeks from today, in accordance with law. January 11, 2021 (ARUN MONGA) Vandana JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No