High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCOCP/2390/2016disposed of

Prithvi Raj v. Parveen Thind

2017-02-23Mr. Justice Inderjit Singh1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH COCP No.2390 of 2016 Date of decision: 23.02.2017 Prithvi Raj ..Petitioner

Versus

Parveen Thind ..Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY

Present:

Mr. Harpal Singh, Advocate for Mr. Peeush Gagneja, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Nilesh Bhardwaj, DAG, Punjab for the respondent.

*** Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral) Learned State counsel has filed reply in the Court and the same is taken on record.

Learned State counsel submits that the parties were not properly impleaded and because of the fault on the part of the petitioner, direction was issued to respondent No.2 but he was not competent authority. Subsequently, the order was conveyed to the competent authority and the same has been complied with vide order dated 17.02.2017, which is annexed as Annexure R-1/T with the reply.

Since the order has been passed, nothing remains in the present petition.

Disposed of accordingly.

However, in case, the petitioner is still aggrieved in any manner, he is at liberty to avail the appropriate remedy. 23.02.2017 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) neetu JUDGE √ Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No √ Whether Reportable Yes/No Neetu Rani 2017.03.01 12:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh