Sumit Phool v. State Of Haryana And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-454-2025 Decided on : 10.01.2025 Sumit Phool . . . Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana and another . . . Respondent(s)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH PRESENT: Mr. Amardeep Sheoran, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Kanwar Sanjiv Kumar, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. Nitish Yadav, Advocate for respondent No.2.

**** SANJAY VASHISTH , J. (Oral) 1.

On advance notice, learned State counsel appearing for respondent No.1 - State, informs that there are more than one accused, however, the compromise petition has been filed by only one. 2.

Faced with the situation, counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw present petition with liberty to file a fresh one by impleading all the required parties in the petition. 3.

Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as sought and recorded here-above.

(SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE January 10, 2025 J.Ram Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No JAWALA RAM 2025.01.10 20:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document