High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCOCP/2451/2016dismissed

Rakesh Kukhreja & ANR. v. Vikash Gupta, Ias

2019-02-05Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur2 pages

COCP-2451-2016 and connected cases -1207(7 cases)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH 1.

COCP-2451-2016 Date of Decision: February 05, 2019 Rakesh Kukhreja and another .....Petitioners

Versus

Vikash Gupta ......Respondent 2.

COCP-2969-2016 Madhu Singh .....Petitioner

Versus

Rajesh Kumar and others ......Respondent 3.

COCP-2968-2016 Rajesh Sanan .....Petitioner

Versus

Rajesh Kumar and others ......Respondents 4.

COCP-2967-2016 Chanderkala Yadav ......Petitioner

Versus

Rajesh Kumar and others ......Respondents 5.

COCP-2966-2016 Dr.Amitabh Dutta .....Petitioner

Versus

Rajesh Kumar and others .....Respondents 6.

COCP-2965-2016 Ch.Zile Singh .....Petitioner

Versus

Rajesh Kumar and others .....Respondents and 7.

COCP-2521-2016 Sheenam Aggarwal .....Petitioner

Versus

Yashindra Singh .....Respondent MEENU 2019.02.07 11:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

COCP-2451-2016 and connected cases -2CORAM: HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR

Present:

Mr.Rajpal Singh, Advocate for Mr.Johan Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners in COCP-2451 and 2521 of 2016. Mr.Prateek Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.Anil Chawla, Advocate for the respondents. ........

NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) All the above mentioned contempt petitions shall stand disposed of by this common order.

In compliance of the order dated 30.01.2018, affidavit of Amardeep Jain, Estate Officer, Haryana Shahri Vikas Pradhikaran, Faridabad filed by learned counsel for the respondents in COCP No.2451 of 2016 is taken on record. Separate seven drafts amounting to `2,000/- qua each of the petitioner towards costs are handed over to learned counsel for the petitioners. Copy of the same is taken on record. It is not disputed that the entire issue involved in the present contempt petitions is now a subject matter of CWP No.5663 of 2017, wherein further allotment of plots has been stayed. In view of the same, no useful purpose would be served in continuing with the contempt petitions. The same are hereby dismissed. The rule issued against the respondent(s) stands discharged. However, petitioners are at liberty to file a fresh petition in case favourable order is passed qua them.

February 05, 2019 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No MEENU 2019.02.07 11:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh