Nachattar Singh v. Amar Partap Singh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH COCP-2417-2017 (O & M) Date of decision: 29.08.2017 Nachattar Singh ....Petitioner V/s Amar Partap Singh

...Respondent(s)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Vinod Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** Rajan Gupta, J. (Oral) Notice of motion.

Mr. Mr. Aditya Sharda, AAG, Punjab, present in court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State.

Petitioner alleges violation of order dated 31.05.2017 passed by the writ court. Operative part thereof reads as under:- "The prayer of the petitioner appears to be fair and just. Without going into the merits and demerits of the claim of the petitioner, I deem it appropriate to direct the 3rd respondentDeputy commissioner, Sangrur to consider the representation dated 03.05.2017 (Annexure P-2) within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and shall pass a speaking order thereon."

At the outset, learned State counsel submits that decision shall be taken on the representation at the earliest, in any case, not later than one month.

In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, no further direction is necessary. However, in case, needful is not done, Sukhpreet Kaur 2017.09.02 13:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

COCP-2417-2017 (O & M) ::2::

petitioner has to invoke the jurisdiction of this court afresh, this court shall impose exemplary costs, which shall be deducted from the salary of the officials responsible for the delay/non-compliance. Disposed of.

(RAJAN GUPTA) August 29, 2017 JUDGE sukhpreet Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Sukhpreet Kaur 2017.09.02 13:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document