M/S Swastik Filling Station v. Narpal Singh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH **** COCP No.2507 of 2018 Date of Decision: 18.10.2019 M/s Swastik Filling Station Petitioner
Versus
Narpal Singh, Senior Divisional Retail Sales Manager, Panipat Marketing Complex, Village Baholi, Panipat Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN
Present:
Mr. Ashutosh Jerath, Advocate for Ms. Palak Dev, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. M.S. Rana, Advocate for Mr. Ashish Kapoor, Advocate for the respondent.
**** AVNEESH JHINGAN, J (Oral):
Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the Letters Patent Appeal [LPA] has been preferred by respondent and as per interim order, contempt petition cannot be proceeded with as on date.
In view of above, contempt petition is disposed of at this stage with liberty to revive the same, if cause of action survives either after decision of the LPA or the interim order is modified. [AVNEESH JHINGAN] JUDGE October 18, 2019
PANKAJ BAWEJA 2019.10.19 13:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Ciourt, Chandigarh