Vinod Mahajan & ORS v. Roshan Sunkaria And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH COCP-2611-2014 (O & M) Date of decision: 27.07.2017 Vinod Mahajan and ors.

....Petitioner V/s Dr. Roshan Sunkaria and ors.

...Respondent(s)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Aakash Singla, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Rohit Arya, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. Aman Chuahdary, Advocate, for respondents No.2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 16, 17, 20 to 24.

Mr. Naveen Mandhar, Advocate, for Mr. Pankaj Bali, Advocate, for respondent No.14.

**** Rajan Gupta, J. (Oral) Petitioners have filed this contempt petition alleging violation of order dated 12.09.2013 passed by the writ court. Admittedly, some of the colleges have already complied with order. Grievance of the petitioners stand redressed. It has further been pointed out that respondents No.4, 5, 10, 12, 13 and 19 have still not carried out the directions. Petition is disposed of with a direction to the concerned respondents to do the needful to purge the contempt within 02 months from today. In case, needful is not done, petitioners shall be at liberty to seek revival of this petition. In such eventuality, this court shall consider imposition of exemplary costs on such respondents who have failed to Sukhpreet Kaur 2017.07.31 11:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

COCP-2611-2014 (O & M) ::2::

comply with the order. Needless to observe such costs would be deductable from the salary of the responsible officials. (RAJAN GUPTA) July 27, 2017 JUDGE sukhpreet Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Sukhpreet Kaur 2017.07.31 11:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document