Vikram Singh v. Anil Kumar And ANR.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH COCP No. 380 of 2010 Date of decision : 02.03.2017 Vikram Singh ....Petitioner V/s Anil Kumar & anr.
....Respondents BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present:
Mr. Mani Ram Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rohit Arya, Asst. A.G. Haryana.
RAJAN GUPTA J.
Learned State counsel submits that sanction has been received. Petitioner is likely to be appointed as clerk shortly by the competent authority.
In view of above, grievance of the petitioner has been redressed. No further direction is necessary. Contempt petition is disposed of.
Petitioner shall, however, be at liberty to seek revival of the petition in case appointment is not offered to him within six weeks. March 02, 2017 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:
Yes/No Whether reportable:
Yes/No Ajay Kumar 2017.03.03 15:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document