Ujjagar Singh v. Gurpal Singh Chahal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH COCP No.265 of 2016 Date of decision: 12.01.2017 Ujjagar Singh ..Petitioner

Versus

Sh. Gurpal Singh ..Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY

Present:

Mr. Pranav Grover, Advocate for Mr. Vikas Chatrath, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Anupam Singla, Advocate for the respondent.

*** Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the respondent submits that in pursuance of order passed by this Court on 04.02.2016, the petitioner has already been paid revised gratuity, revised pension arrears as well as the interest. Learned counsel for the respondent also submits that the qualifying service has been considered from the date of initial appointment. A short reply by way of affidavit of Sh. Ravinder Singh, Managing Director, Pepru Road Transport Corporation, Patiala is also on record wherein the facts as argued by learned counsel for the respondent have been mentioned.

Since the benefits have been granted, nothing survives in the present petition.

Disposed of accordingly.

Neetu Rani 2017.01.19 10:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

COCP No.265 of 2016 However, in case, the petitioner is still aggrieved in any manner, he is at liberty to move representation. 12.01.2017 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) neetu JUDGE √ Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No √ Whether Reportable Yes/No Neetu Rani 2017.01.19 10:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh