Anita Sharma And Others v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP-269-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision : 19.03.2026 Anita Sharma & Ors ... Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana & Ors ... Respondent(s) CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI Present :

Mr. Rohan Moudgil, Advocate for Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG Haryana.

ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral) 1.

Prayer in the present writ petition is for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to take the possession of the petitioners' land situated in Village Harsaru, District Gurugram without following the process as laid down in the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

2.

Admittedly, the possession in the present case has been taken and handed over to Haryana Shahari Vikas Pradhikaran vide Rapat No.399 dated 23.12.2016. As per the reply filed on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 4, the entire compensation stands deposited and the amount of ₹60,83,95,839/- was available for disbursement with the Land Acquisition Collector and the amount of ₹6,89,66,737/- qua the petitioners was available for disbursement YOGESH SHARMA 2026.03.20 10:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.

Chandigarh

CWP-269-2023 (O&M) with the Court of the learned Additional District Judge, Gurugram. 3.

In view thereof, the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous and the same is disposed off as such. The petitioners would always be at liberty to file a requisite application/execution for release of the compensation amount.

4.

Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off. ( ALKA SARIN ) JUDGE 19.03.2026 Yogesh Sharma ( RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI ) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO YOGESH SHARMA 2026.03.20 10:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.

Chandigarh