Ram Niwas Sharma v. Rajiv Rattan Ias & Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

COCP-2651-2017 Date of decision: 14.05.2018 Ram Niwas Sharma .... Petitioner V/s Rajiv Rattan, IAS and ors.

...Respondent(s)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA

Present:

None for the petitioner.

Mr. Rajesh Sheoran, Addl.A.G., Haryana.

Mr. Anurag Goyal, Advocate, for respondent No.3. **** Rajan Gupta, J. (Oral) Learned State counsel submits that the order dated 09.11.2016 passed by the writ court has been complied with. He referred to Para 2 of the affidavit dated 29.11.2017. Same reads as under:- "2. That in compliance of orders of Hon'ble High Court, the claim of the petitioner has been considered and the revised PPO and GPO has been issued by the Department vide order dated 14.11.2017 and in this regard APR has been issued by the respondent No.2 on 17.11.2017 and moreover the payment has also been received by the petitioner. Copy of the order dated 14.11.2017 as well as copy of APR are annexed as Annexure R-1 and R-II respectively."

In view of the above, present petition has been rendered infructuous and is dismissed as such.

(RAJAN GUPTA) May 14, 2018 JUDGE sukhpreet Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Sukhpreet Kaur 2018.05.19 22:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document