High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/693/2020disposed of

Satnam Singh v. State Of Punjab And Others

2022-10-12Mr. Justice Vinod S. Bhardwaj3 pages

!"# !$%&%"'()) *

* +

(, -

) *. *)

) //// ! "# $$$$ . *)

0 ) -

% # &&'(&&) * +

, * -

( - . /0/0&/1234 526

# #. 7 # # 4 #

# ( 1)8 * * # 9+

8:1:/8&/12 ::):&)1:01:2+ *10'/ ;

.#.,." .

&&(&7/)&/&&, . #

. 1)83&6 * *, ./&/)&/&/;

, ,

#. +- " 1)/&&/&1 +- " < 3 64 "

12/ 316 3#6 * * % 4

!" # # $ %&' (

) * + , *-. *

# # # # ! / %# # % * +, *-. *

0 1 %!2%34) 5 - %3#'%('(

)

36 6

%# 4/ 6

$ %%

)

$ %!%34) 76 $

76 $ $

9 6 76 $

/ *6: ) $ 7$

0 1

$ %3#'%('(

)

%% *

) /

%;# # % 76 $

76 $ $

9 6 76 $

/ *6: ) $ 7$

%;# # % 3

3 5 5 !# # < Learned counsel for the respondent-State further contends that the evidence in the matter has already been recorded and the further proceedings are on head-way, but no application raising challenge to the investigation was filed on behalf of the petitioner either under Section 173(8) of the Cr.P.C. or any other applicable statutory provision. He thus, contends that there is no further surviving cause of action in the present petition. I have heard the learned counsel for the respective parties and have gone through the material available on record. Taking into consideration the aforesaid circumstances and the fact that the prayer of the petitioner for directing the official respondents to file the final report under Section 173 Cr.P.C.

already stands fulfilled and the fact that the Area Magistrate has already taken cognizance of the offences in question, there remains no further surviving grievance of the petitioner and as such, the present petition is hereby disposed of having been rendered as infructuous. However, the passing of aforesaid order shall not prejudice the right of the petitioner to take recourse to the alternative remedy, if any, as he may have in accordance with law.

3. *)

)) :

=> " :

=> "