Suman v. State Of Haryana

PANKAJ KUMAR 2021.08.17 17:27 I am the author of this document CRM-M No.645 of 2020 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.645 of 2020 (O&M) Date of Decision:16.08.2021 (Heard through VC) Suman ..Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR Present:- Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Deepshikha Chauhan, AAG, Haryana.

**** JAISHREE THAKUR, J.

(ORAL) 1.

The instant petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.269 dated 03.06.2019 registered under Sections 376-D, 420 IPC read with Section 34 IPC registered at Police Station Division Mohindergarh. 2.

By an order dated 09.01.2020, this Court had granted interim bail to the petitioner and directed him to join investigation. 3.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would contend that pursuant to order dated 09.01.2020, the petitioner has joined investigation. Apart from that, in an SIT that was constituted, she has been found innocent.

4.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-State on instructions from MHC Amit Kumar submits that the petitioner has been declared innocent.

5.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties.

CRM-M No.645 of 2020 (O&M) -26.

In view of the fact that the petitioner has joined investigation and she has been declared innocent, the instant petition is allowed and the order dated 09.01.2020 granting interim bail to the petitioner is made absolute, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. (JAISHREE THAKUR) August 16, 2021 JUDGE P.Bhatt/Pankaj* Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No