Nirmala Devi v. Priyank Bharti

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH COCP No. 2919 of 2014 (O&M) Date of decision: January 22, 2015 Nirmala Devi 0Petitioner

Versus

Priyank Bharti 444Respondent
 

 

     Present: 4 Mr.M.J.S. Bedi, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. S.C. Pathela, Advocate for the respondent.      Short reply by way of affidavit of Bhupinder Singh Sra Executive Officer, M.C. Rampura Phul, has been filed, in which it has been stated that the total retiral dues payable to the petitioner as per record were Rs.3,34,406/4 out of which a sum of Rs.2,62,000/4 was paid to her up to 02.05.2012 on various date. The balance outstanding amount of Rs.72,406/4 remained payable to the petitioner has since been paid to her on 28.10.2014 vide cheque No. 009090 dated 28.10.2014 towards full and final payment of retiral dues to her. It is stated that the balance amount of Rs. 72,406/4 could not be paid earlier on the account of the wreck financial position of the Municipal Council.

While not disputing the aforesaid fact, learned counsel for the petitioner states that no interest on the delayed payment has been paid to the petitioner.

The scope of the instant contempt petition is limited to the compliance of the directions issued by this Court which was to dispose of the notice of the petitioner. The order has been complied with. The retiral dues have been paid to the petitioner. Thus, this contempt petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. 22.01.2015 (HARINDER SINGH SIDHU) dinesh JUDGE DINESH KUMAR 2015.01.23 04:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh