Parmjeet Kaur v. Krishan Kumar & ANR

COCP 2937/2017 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH COCP 2937/2017 (O&M) Date of decision:10.07.2018 Parmjeet Kaur ..............Petitioner v.

Shri Krishan Kumar and another ..............Respondents Coram:

Hon'ble Mr.Justice Jaswant Singh Present:- Mr.Sunny Singla,Advocate for the petitioner Mr.Manoj Bajaj,Addl.AG Punjab for respondents. Jaswant Singh,J,(Oral).

The petitioner in compliance of the order dated 3.4.2017, whereby the age requirement was held to be 18 to 42 years for the purpose of recruitment to the post of ETT Teachers, has been held to be eligible, however, she has been denied appointment on account of no candidate lower in merit having been appointed in her respective category, vide speaking order dated 15.11.2017.

Counsel for the petitioner states that the aforesaid reason in the speaking order to deny appointment to the petitioner is incorrect, however, concedes that for seeking necessary relief, contempt jurisdiction is not the appropriate forum.

Dismissed.

Rule discharged.

Petitioner is free to challenge the speaking order dated 15.11.2017.

10.07.2018 (Jaswant Singh) joshi Judge Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Rajinder Parshad Joshi 2018.07.11 13:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document