Parkash Devi v. Vineet Garg And ANR

COCP No. 3082 of 2016 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 3082 of 2016 (O&M) Date of decision : 21.11.2018 Parkash Devi ..Petitioner versus Vineet Garg and another .. Respondents Coram:

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur

Present:

Mr. Munish Mittal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Chhavi Sharma, Advocate for Ms. P.S. Chauhan, Advocate, for the respondents. Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the respondents has filed reply by way of an affidavit of Er. Paramvir Singh, XEN TS Division HVPNL Kurukshetra dated 19.11.2018. Copy has been handed over to learned counsel for the petitioner.

It is not in dispute that the order has been complied with. It is further not disputed that the amount so due to the petitioner has since been paid by way of cheque, copy of which has also been placed on record at page 23 of the affidavit.

In view of the admitted position, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the contempt petition, the same is accordingly dismissed.

However, in case the petitioner is not satisfied with said order passed, she is at liberty to avail of legal remedy available to her in SHARMILA DEVI 2018.11.26 17:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document phhc

COCP No. 3082 of 2016 -2accordance with law.

Rule issued to the respondents stands discharged. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 21.11.2018 sharmila Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No SHARMILA DEVI 2018.11.26 17:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document phhc