Om Parkash v. Sarvesh Kaushal And ORS
VINOD KUMAR 2015.07.27 11:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH COCP No.319 of 2015 Date of decision:23.07.2015 Om Parkash
...Petitioner
Versus
Sh. Sarvesh Kaushal and others
...Respondents
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain
Present:
None for the petitioner.
Mr. Anant Kataria, DAG, Punjab, for the respondents.
***** Rakesh Kumar Jain, J. (Oral) Counsel for the respondents has submitted that the only direction issued by this Court was to consider and decide the representation/legal notice of the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of receipt thereof. It is submitted that the order passed by this Court has been duly complied with as the representation of the petitioner has been considered and rejected vide order dated 07.05.2015. In view of the statement made by counsel for the respondents, the present contempt petition has become infructuous and is dismissed as such.
However, if the petitioner is not satisfied with the order dated 07.05.2015 passed against him, he may avail his remedy, in accordance with law.
July 23, 2015 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) vinod* Judge