Sona Rani v. Harbans Singh Sandhu
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH COCP No.3209 of 2015 Date of decision: 12.01.2017 Sona Rani ..Petitioner
Versus
Harbans Singh Sandhu ..Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
Present:
Mr. J.P.S. Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. P.S. Bajwa, Addl. A.G., Punjab.
*** Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the respondent submits that in compliance of order passed by this Court on 10.04.2015 in CWP No.6796 of 2015, the case of the petitioner was considered vide order dated 24.12.2016 (Annexure R-1) whereas learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the claim has not been considered as per directions issued by this Court. Since the order has been complied with as per directions, nothing survives in the petition.
Disposed of accordingly.
However, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the same. 12.01.2017 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) neetu JUDGE √ Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No √ Whether Reportable Yes/No Neetu Rani 2017.01.17 10:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh