Jagir Singh v. Padam Parkash Bhoj Vaid And ANR.

COCP No. 3174 of 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH COCP No. 3174 of 2017 Date of decision : 02.11.2017 Jagir Singh ....Petitioner V/s Padam Parkash Bhoj Vaid & anr.

....Respondents BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Ajay Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. RAJAN GUPTA J.

Notice of motion.

On the asking of court, Mr. Gaurav Jindal, Addl. A.G. Haryana, who is present in court, accepts notice.

Petitioner alleges violation of order dated 25.04.2017 passed by writ court, operative part thereof reads as under:- "In the circumstances, this writ court is allowed and the respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioners for regularization of their services from the date services of their juniors were regularized. Necessary exercise be carried out within two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order."

At the outset learned State counsel submits that in case appeal has not been filed against the order passed by writ court, it shall be ensured that same be complied with at the earliest, in any case not later than three months.

Ajay Kumar 2017.11.04 12:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

COCP No. 3174 of 2017 In view of statement made by learned State counsel, no further direction is necessary. Disposed of. It is however, clarified that in the eventuality a fresh cause of action accrues to the petitioner to invoke the contempt jurisdiction of this court, apart from initiating proceedings under the Act, it shall also impose exemplary costs which shall be deducted from the salary of the official(s) responsible for delay/non-compliance. November 02, 2017 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No Ajay Kumar 2017.11.04 12:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document