Neelam Sharma v. Haryana Shehari Vikas Pradhikaran And Others

CWP-481-2022 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-481-2022 Date of decision: 29.08.2024 Neelam Sharma .... Petitioner Vs.

Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran and others .... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL

Present:

Mr. Gaurav Bakshi, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Arvind Seth, Advocate for the respondent-HSVP Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. **** ARUN PALLI, J.

Having argued the matter at some length, learned counsel for the parties submit that in the wake of the policy dated August 06, 2024, issued by the Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran (HSVP), that envisages allotment of alternate site/plot to the original allottees/reallottees, the claim of the petitioners could be examined in terms thereof. However, learned counsel for the respondents-HSVP submit that owing to the Model Code of Conduct, that is in operation with respect to the ensuing Assembly Elections, three months' time be granted to the authorities to deal with the concerns/grievances of each of the petitioners and pass necessary orders, in accordance with law. It is urged that before any such orders are passed, the petitioners shall also be heard. And, a formal communication in this regard shall be issued to them, well in advance.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is agreeable to the course suggested by the learned counsel for the respondents-HSVP and submits that let this petition be disposed of in terms of the statement made by him. DEEPAK KUMAR 2024.09.03 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document P & H High Court, Chandigarh

CWP-481-2022 -2In the wake of the position sketched out above, and in terms of the statement made by learned counsel for the parties, this petition is accordingly disposed of. However, the interim order dated August 05, 2022, will continue to operate till a formal decision, as indicated above, is reached by the respondent authorities.

This Court is sanguine that the authority shall consider/examine the matter in the right earnest, and pass appropriate orders, assigning reasons in support thereof, as expeditiously as possible. Needless to assert that this order shall not constitute an expression of opinion on the merits of the case of either party, for, as indicated earlier, the competent authority shall examine the grievances of the petitioners, strictly in accordance with law. (ARUN PALLI) JUDGE (VIKRAM AGGARWAL) JUDGE 29.08.2024 deepak Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR 2024.09.03 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document P & H High Court, Chandigarh