Ajay Alias Chhotiya v. State Of Haryana




    
    
 

 !"#$ %#&

 '# ((((( 



) * * *

+"# ((((( *     ,- ( *
)*
(
 

 



      

      





)*
$.

-/   !

"#$%      

  &   

This is a petition filed being aggrieved of order dated 1.4.2021 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jind rejecting the regular bail in FIR No.339, dated 19.12.2019 under Sections 379-B, 120-B, 201 and 411 of IPC registered at Police Station City Narwana, District Jind. The FIR was registered at the instance of Vikram Singh against the unknown persons. The allegations were that he was serving at Goyal Service Station, Narwana. On 19.12.2019, he was going to deposit cash in Axis Bank, Narwana. On the way to the bank, three youngsters came on the motorcycle with muffled faces and carrying dandas. They hit the motorcycle against the bike of the complainant, gave beating, snatched cash and fled away, there was CCTV footage of the incident available with the police. During the investigation, Amit @ Meet, Amit @ Anta and Ajay @ Chotia (petitioner) were named. The name of the petitioner surfaced in the disclosure statement. Earlier application for bail was dismissed as withdrawn on 26.5.2021.

REEMA SAINI 2022.01.28 20:55 I attest to the accuracy of this document High Court, Chandigarh

CRM-M-1921 of 2022 -2Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not named in the FIR. He was named in a disclosure statement. He submits that the complainant has not supported the case of the prosecution in his deposition in the trial. He has specifically stated that the petitioner is not the person who snatched the amount and inflicted injuries. He relies upon the fact that co-accused was granted bail.

Learned State counsel opposes the grant of bail and on instructions from ASI Dilbagh, is not disputing the contention raised by learned counsel for petitioner. He fairly submits that the petitioner is not involved in any other case.

Without making any comments on the merits of the case, considering that the investigation is complete and the petitioner is in custody since December 2019 and conclusion of trial is likely to take time, bail

 &          & 

'             

(  &  ) 

 &   

*   



((+

"

 (       '       '  ((  ' 



 ,             

.)*
/ 

 !"#$   
 
 


    

 
  REEMA SAINI 2022.01.28 20:55 I attest to the accuracy of this document High Court, Chandigarh