Ganesh Kumar Bansal v. Vini Mahajan & ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH COCP-411-2015 (O&M) Date of Decision: January 17, 2019 Ganesh Kumar Bansal .....Petitioner

Versus

Ms.Vini Mahajan and another ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR

Present:

Mr.Arvind Galav, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.B.S.Sewak, Addl.A.G.,Punjab.

........

NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) Reply has been filed. As per the said reply, the order has been complied with by way of passing a speaking order dated 15.01.2019. The same is placed on record as Annexure R/2 vide which part of the benefits have been granted, but ACP has been with-held as the petitioner has been awarded punishment in two chargesheets.

In this view of the matter, no useful purpose would be served in continuing with the contempt petition. The same is hereby dismissed. The rule issued against the respondent(s) stands discharged. However, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the order dated 15.01.2019 in case he is still aggrieved with the same. January 17, 2019 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No MEENU 2019.01.18 10:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh