Tej Singh And ANR v. Om Parkash & ORS

COCP-3399-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH.

CM-16425-CII-2019 in/and COCP No. 3399 of 2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: January 29, 2020 Tej Singh and another ..........PETITIONERS

VERSUS

Om Parkash and others ........RESPONDENTS CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Sanjay Vij, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. S.S.Mann, Sr. D.A.G., Haryana.

Mr. Deepak Balyan, Advocate for respondents No. 2 and 5.

Mr. Rajat Garg, Advocate for Mr. Aditya Jain, Advocate for respondent No. 3-applicant.

Mr. Rajesh Lamba, Advocate for respondent No. 4 Mr. Kamal Chaudhary, Advocate for respondent No. 6.

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) Reply by way of affidavit on behalf of respondent No. 1 filed today in the Court is taken on record.

The order dated 16.08.2018 was passed against the respondentMunicipal Committee, Sohna through its President and Secretary. In this petition, neither the President nor the Secretary have impleaded as a party, rather the petitioners have been impleaded the Naib Tehsildar, Executive JYOTI 2020.01.31 09:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

COCP-3399-2018 Officer, Municipal Engineer, Junior Engineer, Patwari and Contractor as party, who were not party in the regular second appeal. In view of this, contempt petition cannot be proceeded against them and is dismissed with liberty to file fresh one with better particulars. ( SURINDER GUPTA ) JUDGE January 29, 2020 Jyoti-II Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No JYOTI 2020.01.31 09:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document