High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCOCP/3498/2017dismissed

Dalip Singh v. Raj Kumar Jindal And ANR

2018-11-29Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur3 pages

-1226(6 cases)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH 1.

COCP-3498-2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 29, 2018 Dalip Singh .....Petitioner

Versus

Raj Kumar Jindal and another ......Respondents 2.

COCP-3501-2017 (O&M) Mithan Lal .....Petitioner

Versus

Raj Kumar Jindal and another ......Respondents 3.

COCP-534-2018 (O&M) Sarwan Kumar .....Petitioner

Versus

Raj Kumar Jindal and another ......Respondents 4.

COCP-535-2018 (O&M) Asha Rani .....Petitioner

Versus

Raj Kumar Jindal and another ......Respondents 5.

COCP-536-2018 (O&M) Kewal Krishan .....Petitioner

Versus

Raj Kumar Jindal and another ......Respondents and 6.

COCP-1177-2018 (O&M) Gurdeep Siingh .....Petitioner

Versus

Raj Kumar Jindal and another ......Respondents

-2CORAM: HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR

Present:

Mr.P.K.Goklaney and Mr.Ashish Goklaney, Advocates for the petitioners. Ms.Anu Chatrath, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Nishant Maini, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 2-PSPCL.

Mr.Pulkit Jain, Advocate for Mr.Sahil Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2 in COCP-1177-2018.

........

NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) This order shall dispose of the above captioned contempt petitions as the point in issue involved in all the cases is common in nature. Applications filed in COCP Nos.3498 and 3501 of 2017, COCP Nos.534, 535 and 536 of 2018 for placing on record replies filed on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2 are allowed and the same are taken on record. Reply filed on behalf of respondent No.2 in COCP No.1177 of 2018 today in Court is also taken on record.

As per the replies, the orders have been complied with and the amount due to the petitioner(s) has since been paid for which Annexures with the reply have also been placed on record. In this view of the matter, the contempt petition have become infructuous and the same are dismissed as such. The rule issued against the respondent(s) stands discharged. In case the petitioners are still aggrieved with the amount so paid and there is any discrepancy, they are at liberty to file representation within two weeks from today and in case the same is filed within the

-3stipulated period, the respondents shall further consider and decide by passing a speaking order within four weeks from the date of receipt of said representation.

November 29, 2018 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No