Sikandar Singh @ Sakandar Singh v. Yadhvir Singh Malik And ORS
233(5 cases), 235
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH 1.
COCP-3517-2018 Date of Decision: February 22, 2019 Sikandar Singh @ Sakandar Singh .....Petitioner
Versus
Yudhvir Singh Malik and others ......Respondents 2.
COCP-3518-2018 Balbir Singh ....Petitioner
Versus
Yudhvir Singh Malik and others ......Respondents 3.
COCP-3519-2018 Nirmal Singh ....Petitioner
Versus
Yudhvir Singh Malik and others ......Respondents 4.
COCP-3520-2018 Nirmaljit Kaur ......Petitioner
Versus
Yudhvir Singh Malik and others ......Respondents 5.
COCP-3521-2018 Bikramjit Singh ....Petitioner
Versus
Yudhvir Singh Malik and others ......Respondents COCP-3532-2018 Balwant Singh and another .....Petitioners
Versus
Yudhvir Singh Malik and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR
Present:
None for the petitioners.
Mr.Rishi Kaushal, Advocate for respondent Nos.1&2-NHAI. Ms.Sudeepti Sharma, Addl.AG, Punjab.
........
MEENU 2019.02.26 10:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh
NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) This order shall dispose of the above captioned contempt petitions as the point in issue involved in all the cases is common in nature. Learned counsel for the NHAI states that the payment has been made in CALA account vide PIU office letter No.PD/PIU/JAL/2018/Court case/200-A/4041 dated 24.08.2018, Annexure R1/1. Separate replies filed by learned State counsel in all the cases are taken on record stating therein that the amount has already stands disbursed.
In view of the above, the contempt petitions are disposed of. The rule issued against the respondent(s) stands discharged. However, in case, the petitioners are aggrieved in any manner, they are at liberty to revive the present contempt petitions. February 22, 2019 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) meenuss JUDGE 1.
Whether speaking/reasoned ?
Yes/No 2.
Whether reportable ?
Yes/No MEENU 2019.02.26 10:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh