Suresh Kumar v. Sarvjit Singh And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH COCP-3606-2018 Date of Decision: May 16, 2019 Suresh Kumar .....Petitioner

Versus

Sarvjit Singh and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR

Present:

Mr.Prince Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Aditya Sharda, AAG, Punjab.

Mr.Amit Singh Sethi, Advocate for respondent Nos.3 to 5-Corporation.

........

NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) It is not disputed that some payment has been released whereas with respect to the remaining balance amount, vigilance enquiry is pending. Learned counsel for the Corporation, on instructions from the Divisional Engineer, states that the balance payment will be made after clearance of the vigilance enquiry.

In view of the same, contempt petition is dismissed, at this stage with liberty to file a fresh one in case the need so arises. Rule issued against the respondents stands discharged. May 16, 2019 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No MEENU 2019.05.17 17:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh