← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/1139/2022disposed of

Sandeep Kaushik v. State Of Haryana And Others

2022-02-03Mr. Justice Arun Monga2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP-1139-2022 Date of decision: 03.02.2022 Sandeep Kaushik

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA

Present:

Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Saurabh Mohunta, DAG, Haryana.

(Presence marked through Video Conference) -.- ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL) Petitioner herein, inter alia, seeks issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to consider his claim for promotion to the post of Sub Divisional Engineer (Civil) under Degree Quota as per Rule 9 of the Haryana Development and Panchayats Department (Group B) Service Rules, 2016.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner qua his aforesaid grievance submitted a representation dated 02.08.2019 (Annexure P-12) followed by another representation dated 10.11.2021 (Annexure P-13) but the same have not been adverted by the respondents till date. Hence, the instant petition.

3.

On advance service, learned State counsel joins proceedings and opposes issuance of notice of motion and submits that competent authority shall take decision either way, on the pending representation of the petitioner, in due course.

VANDANA 2022.02.04 18:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner also agrees that let a final decision be taken, by the competent authority on the pending representation dated 10.11.2021 (Annexure P-13).

5.

Given the nature of order being passed, there is no necessity to seek return by any of the respondents as no further proceedings and/or pleadings are required.

6.

Without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to look into the grievance of the petitioner as per representation dated 10.11.2021 (Annexure P13) and also by keeping in view the contentions raised in the present petition by treating the same as supplementary representation and take a decision, in accordance with law.

7.

Let the needful be done within a period of three months from today.

8.

Disposed of accordingly.

(ARUN MONGA) JUDGE February 03, 2022 vandana Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No VANDANA 2022.02.04 18:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document