Naresh Bala v. Promod Ban And ANR

VINOD KUMAR 2015.05.04 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh COCP No.912 of 2015 [ 1 ] *****

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH COCP No.912 of 2015 Date of decision:01.05.2015 Naresh Bala

...Petitioner

Versus

Promod Ban and another

...Respondents

CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain

Present:

Mr. Gagan Oberoi, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Anant Kataria, AAG, Punjab.

***** Rakesh Kumar Jain, J.

Vide order dated 17.03.2015, the Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana, was directed to take appropriate steps, if required, for providing security to the petitioner whenever she has to appear in the trial Court for evidence.

This petition dated 08.04.2015 was filed on 09.04.2015 and re-filed on 20.04.2015, in which notice was issued on 22.04.2015. Reply is filed by respondent No.2 along with an order passed by respondent No.1 as per which ASI Gurwinder Singh No.1438/Ldh and Ct. Tejinder Singh No.3235/Ldh, posted at Police Station Jodhewal, Ludhiana, have been deputed to protect life and liberty of the petitioner as per scheduled date of hearing of the case FIR No.49 dated 18.03.2009,

VINOD KUMAR 2015.05.04 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh COCP No.912 of 2015 [ 2 ] ***** under Sections 325, 324, 323, 341, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 registered at Police Station Salem Tabri, Ludhiana, in the concerned trial Court, Ludhiana and made the concerned Station House Officer responsible to ensure the compliance of the orders passed by this Court. In view of the aforesaid order dated 08.04.2015 passed by respondent No.1, the order passed by this Court on 17.03.2015 has been duly complied with, therefore, this petition is hereby disposed of as having become infructuous.

Rule is discharged.

May 01, 2015 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) vinod* Judge