Kashmir Kaur v. State Of Punjab And ORS
CWP-931-2021 CWP-11876-2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH 216+218 CWP-931-2021 Date of decision: 30.04.2025 Kashmir Kaur
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others ..Respondents CWP-11876-2021 Satya Devi
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY *****
Present:
Mr. Varinder Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Arun Gupta, DAG, Punjab.
***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1.
Both the cases involve similar issues and therefore, are being disposed of together by this common order, for the sake of convenience the facts are derived from CWP-931-2021.
2.
Prayer made in the present petitions is for setting aside order dated 08.05.2020, whereby the claim of the petitioner was partly accepted w.e.f. 08.03.2019 instead of 04.03.1999 for regularization of service. 3.
Learned counsel submits that the petitioner was entitled for grant of regularization w.e.f. 04.03.1999 instead of 08.03.2019, which was granted to Surjit Kaur as the policy based on which it had been allowed was the same and her case had attained finality and even SLP had been dismissed on 09.12.2016, Annexure P-6, regarding which a legal notice dated 25.02.2020, Annexure P-9, had been served by her upon the respondents. In response HAMANT 2025.05.01 18:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-931-2021 CWP-11876-2021 thereto, a parawise reply was submitted, which was also without even distinguishing her case from the aforesaid employee, no order as such had been passed.
4.
The aforesaid facts having been brought out, during the course of hearing, learned State counsel, on instructions, states that the respondents would not be averse to have a relook at the matter and decided afresh, taking note of the aforesaid submissions, within a period of 6 months, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner.
5.
The aforesaid satisfies the learned counsel for the petitioners. 6.
The matter stands disposed of accordingly and if the petitioners are found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to their interest, the same may be passed after granting opportunity of hearing to them and shall contain reasons, whereupon they shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. 7.
A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of connected case. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 30.04.2025 Hemant Whether speaking/reasoned :
Yes / No Whether reportable :
Yes / No HAMANT 2025.05.01 18:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document