Jagmohan v. State Of Haryana
1-
!" #$%$ &'( ) &* +,-
' ./ 01 00
!
"
### 0 -2 /3'
$
"
%&'
(
) * *
'+', - .()/0
*
$ "
$ 12 ) '&'
'3 +4 '+',
%'+ %53 %5& %362
"
7
6&5+ "
7
88 !
88 '
12$
""
$!"::
"" "
!
88 :
:
" : " $"
9
:
$
;
:
:$ "
$
:
$
2- :"" ":"
$!"
; "
$
: $ "
*
12
$
"
$ ": : $ 7 "
"
88
+3 +6 '+'= ,
$
"
$
$ " $
" " "
$
""
$8
2
" $!"
"
$
"
:"
:
:
"
"" )
"
$
$
""
12 8
)
$
"
9
$ >
$
; $ "
% "
":
$
""
:
:
"
"
$!" :
" "
"
$
$!"
"
:
;?"
!
; $ :""
3-
"
" " 2 "
$ "":
= 2
"
"
:
"""
" $"
"
""
:
; ""
"
"
@":" " "
$ $ !"$
"
:
2 $
: $
9 "
1
"
2t is well settled proposition of law that arrest is a part of procedure of the investigation to secure not only the presence of the accused but several other purposes. The powers of anticipatory bail are extra ordinary and the same are to be exercised sparingly and in exceptional circumstances. The Court must be circumspect while exercising such power for grant of anticipatory bail and it should not be granted as a matter of rule and has to be granted only when the Court is convinced that exceptional circumstances exist to resort to that extra ordinary remedy. In the present case, no such exceptional circumstances warranting exercise of the powers for grant of anticipatory bail by this Court are existing. As such, I am of the considered opinion that the petition does not deserve to be allowed. Accordingly, the same is dismissed.
47.
It is clarified that observations made hereinabove shall not be construed as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case. 8.
Since the main petition has been dismissed, pending application if any is rendered infructuous.
40 5 ( ) &* +,-