Paramjit Kaur v. Lakhwinder Singh & ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH COCP-485-2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: February 01, 2019 Paramjit Kaur alias Bimaljeet Kaur .....Petitioner

Versus

Lakhwinder Singh and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR

Present:

Mr.Arun Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms.Sudeepti Sharma, Addl.AG, Punjab.

Mr.Rajan Bansal, Advocate for the respondents. ........

NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) The contempt petition is filed for non-compliance of the order dated 13.10.2011 vide which a direction was issued only to decide the representation.

The representation has been decided since long and after various orders passed by this Court finally vide Annexure R-3, rectification has also been carried out in the name of the owner in the revenue records by entering the name of the petitioner in Column No.5 from the year 2012-13. In view of the same, the contempt petition is dismissed. The rule issued against the respondent(s) stands discharged. However, in case the petitioner is still aggrieved that the entry is from the year 2012-13 and not from the year 2007, she is at liberty to avail the remedy as available to her under the law. February 01, 2019 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No MEENU 2019.02.04 11:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh