← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/3668/2020disposed of

Paramjit Kaur v. State Of Punjab And Others

2026-05-01Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-3668-2020 Date of decision : 01.05.2026 PARAMJIT KAUR ...... PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...... RESPONDENTS

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present :

Mr. Abhinandan Sekhri, Advocate for Mr. Raj Kumar Arya, Advocate for the petitioner.

***** SURYA PARTAP SINGH . J.(Oral) 1.

The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner for directions to the respondents No.2 and 3 to take action against the respondents No.6 to 9.

2.

The learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed representation dated 16.07.2019 (Annexure P-2) before the respondent No.2-the Senior Superintendent of Police (Rural) Amritsar. The learned counsel prays for directions to the respondent No.2 to decide the abovementioned representation within the stipulated time. 3.

Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 5 only. 4.

Since advance notice has already been served upon the State, Mr. J.S. Thind, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 VIPIN KUMAR 2026.05.02 12:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-3668-2020 to 5-State. Hence, the service of notice upon the State is hereby dispensed with.

5.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a direction for deciding the representation of the petitioner (Annexure P-2) be given to the respondent No.2 and that the instant petition be disposed of accordingly. 6.

Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to decide the representation of the petitioner (Annexure P-2), by passing a speaking order within a period of one month from the date of receipt of copy of instant order. It is however clarified that no finding is being returned by this Court, with regard to merits of the contents of representation. The respondent No.2 shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to contents of representation of the petitioner, and take an independent decision at his own level.

(SURYA PARTAP SINGH) JUDGE 01.05.2026 vipin Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether Reportable :

No VIPIN KUMAR 2026.05.02 12:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document