Ranjeet Singh v. State Of Punjab And Others

2024:PHHC:016203

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-616-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision: 06.02.2024 RANJEET SINGH ---PETITIONER V/S STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS --- RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present :

None for the petitioner.

Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab.

**** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1.

The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to the respondents to consider him for the post of Assistant Legal Officer. 2.

Learned State counsel, at the outset, submits that the petitioner has applied under PwD category and he has secured 259 marks whereas cut off in his category was 268, thus, the petitioner cannot be issued appointment letter.

3.

In the wake of statement of learned State counsel, the present petition stands disposed of.

4.

There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, thus, he is at liberty to move an appropriate application if cause survives. 06.02.2024 (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) anju JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Anju Goel 2024.02.06 17:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh