Parveen Kumar v. Dinesh Chander Sharma And Another

COCP-639-2018 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-639-2018 Date of Decision: March 07, 2019 Parveen Kumar .....Petitioner

Versus

Dinesh Chander Sharma and another ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR

Present:

Mr.S.K.Daaria, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.RTPS Tulsi, Advocate with Mr.Sunil Sahore and Abhay K.Sharma, Advocate for the respondents.

........

NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) The contempt petition is filed for non-compliance of the order dated 22.05.2017 vide which the writ petition was disposed of with a following observations:- "In this view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of with a clarificatory direction that in case the competent authority decides to introduce/re-introduce the Scheme with or without any modification, let the claim/request of the petitioner be re-considered within three months from the date such request is made."

Learned counsel for the respondents have placed on record the order passed by the Apex Court dated 06.03.2019 wherein it is specifically held that since the Scheme stands terminated and is no longer in existence, nothing further need be done in the matter. Since the very order dated 22.05.2017 was only to the extent that the respondents were required to reconsider in case the Scheme was introduced/re-introduced, no contempt is said to be made out in view of the judgment passed by the Apex Court as MEENU 2019.03.08 11:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

COCP-639-2018 -2also taking into account the fact that the said Scheme no longer exists. In this view of the matter, the contempt petition is dismissed. The rule issued against the respondent(s) stands discharged. March 07, 2019 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No MEENU 2019.03.08 11:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh