Satish Kumar And ORS. v. N.K.Verma And ANR.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH COCP-731-2017 (O & M) Date of decision: 16.05.2017 Satish Kumar and ors.

.... Petitioners V/s Col. N.K. Verma and anr.

...Respondent(s)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA

Present:

Mr. R.S. Manhas, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. V. Ramswaroop, Addl.A.G., Punjab.

Mr. Rishi Kaushal, Advocate, for respondent No.1. ***** Rajan Gupta, J. (Oral) Reply on behalf of respondent No.1 has been filed in court today. Same is taken on record. Learned counsel submits that necessary payment has been released to the petitioners. Stand of the State is on similar terms.

Under the circumstances, no cause of action survives in this petition as the order passed by the writ court stands complied with. Thus, this petition is hereby render infructuous and is dismissed as such. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he may be allowed to seek alternative remedy in case any grouse still subsists. No order needs to be passed in this regard as the petitioners would always have liberty to challenge the speaking order. (RAJAN GUPTA) May 16, 2017 JUDGE sukhpreet Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Sukhpreet Kaur 2017.05.17 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document