Rajmal v. Nafe Singh & ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH C.R. No.1189 of 2016 Date of Decision.17.02.2016 Rajmal son of Nihala .......Petitioner Vs.

Nafe Singh and others ......Respondents

Present:

Mr. Raje Ram Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) 1.

There is no justification for the petitioner to arrive to this Court to complain that his side has been closed. It shall be open for the petitioner to approach the very same Court and seek for reopening of the case setting out reasons as to why he could not present at the time when the case was posted for evidence.

2.

Reserving to the petitioner liberty to approach the very same Court, the revision petition is dismissed.

(K. KANNAN) JUDGE February 17, 2016 Pankaj* PANKAJ KUMAR 2016.02.19 12:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document