Simranjit Kaur And ANR v. State Of Punjab And ORS

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh CRWP No. 421 of 2022 Date of Decision: 17.1.2022 Simranjit Kaur and another ......Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESHWAR THAKUR

Present:

Mr. B.S.Jaswal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Bhupender Beniwal, AAG, Punjab.

**** SURESHWAR THAKUR , J.

(ORAL) (Through video conferencing) 1.

The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus hence directing respondents No. 2 and 3 to give protection to the life and liberty of the petitioners, and also against any interference in the peaceful life of the petitioners being made at the behest of respondent No. 4. 2.

The learned State Counsel, does not have any objection, to an order being made by this Court to respondents concerned, to look into and decide through a speaking order, representation Annexure P-5. Consequently, this Court directs respondents concerned, to within three weeks hereafter, hence decide Annexure P-5, through a speaking order. 4.

Petition is disposed of.

5.

A copy of this order be given dasti on payment of usual charges. (SURESHWAR THAKUR) JUDGE January 17, 2022 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

Yes/No GURPREET SINGH 2022.01.17 14:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh