High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCOCP/819/2017disposed of

Madan Lal v. Inderjit Singh And ANR

2017-07-07Mr. Justice Inderjit Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH COCP No.819 of 2017 (O&M) Date of decision: 07.07.2017 Madan Lal ..Petitioner

Versus

Inderjit Singh and another ..Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY

Present:

Mr. Jatin Salwan, Advocate for Mr. P.K. Goklaney, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Akshita Chauhan, AAG, Punjab for the respondents.

*** Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral) Vide order dated 11.08.2015 passed by this Court, CWP No.24475 of 2012 was allowed and impugned order dated 12.09.2012 was quashed. The respondents were directed to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of BPEO. Thereafter, nothing was done and the petitioner has to file the present contempt petition. In response to notice of motion, reply has been filed. Learned State counsel submits that the order passed by this Court has been complied with and the petitioner has been promoted to the post of BPEO w.e.f.06.03.2011.

Since the claim of the petitioner for promotion has been considered and he has been promoted, nothing survives in this contempt petition and the same is disposed of accordingly. Neetu Rani 2017.07.11 10:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

COCP No.819 of 2017 (O&M) However, in case, the petitioner is still aggrieved in any manner, he is at liberty to make representation to the authorities concerned and the same shall be considered within a period of three months thereafter. 07.07.2017 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) neetu JUDGE √ Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No √ Whether Reportable Yes/No Neetu Rani 2017.07.11 10:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh