Chimal Lal Gupta v. Harayna Suraj Malting Ltd & ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CP No.88 of 2014 (O&M) Date of decision: 20.04.2015 Chiman Lal Gupta ... Petitioner Vs.

Haryana Suraj Malting Ltd. & another ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL 1.

Whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment?

2.

To be referred to reporters or not?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present:- Mr. Suresh Kumar Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Gurmeet Bindra, Advocate with Ms. Madhu Dayal, Advocate for the respondent.

AMIT RAWAL J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition.

In view of the aforementioned statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is ordered to be dismissed as withdrawn.

(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE April 20, 2015 savita SAVITA DEVI KADIAN 2015.04.21 13:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh