Aasho @ Asmina v. State Of Haryana

-1CRM-M-1414 of 2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-1414 of 2020 Date of Decision: 02.03.2020 Aasho @ Asmina

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN Present:- Ms. Shalini Atri, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Chetan Sharma, AAG, Haryana.

RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Through instant second petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. prayer has been made for grant of regular bail to petitioner - Aasho @ Asmina - in a case arising from FIR No.174 dated 19.10.2017 registered under Sections 302, 201, 34 IPC at Police Station Bichhor, District Nuh (Mewat).

Petitioner is facing trial in the aforesaid FIR for allegedly murdering her husband with the help of her paramour. Learned counsel inter alia contends that petitioner is in custody since 21.10.2017. Prosecution case against her is based on circumstantial evidence, which is a very weak type of evidence. There is no direct evidence against the petitioner. She has falsely been implicated. She is having four minor children. There is none to look after them. Conclusion of trial may take a sufficient long time. No useful purpose would be served by detaining the petitioner in jail any more. RAVINDER SINGH 2020.03.04 12:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

-2CRM-M-1414 of 2020 On the other hand, learned State counsel vehemently opposed the grant of bail to the petitioner.

Considering overall facts and circumstances, but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the petition is allowed. Consequently, petitioner - Aasho @ Asmina - is ordered to be released on bail during pendency of trial, if not required in any other case, on her furnishing bail bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction of Trial Court/Duty Magistrate concerned.

(RAMENDRA JAIN) March 02, 2020 JUDGE R.S.

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RAVINDER SINGH 2020.03.04 12:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document