Pritam Singh v. Lal Singh Thr Lr Pritam Kaur

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH C.R. No.1281 of 2016 Date of Decision.19.02.2016 Pritam Singh .......Petitioner Vs.

Lal Singh (deceased) through his LR ........Respondent

Present:

Mr. N.K. Suneja, Advocate for the petitioner.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioner's contention is that a compromise/receipt filed in the Executing Court was rejected even without affording any opportunity to let in evidence in that regard. I dispense with notice to the respondent and direct the Executing Court to permit the petitioner to give evidence as regards the compromise/receipt and render an adjudication on the evidence given.

2.

The impugned order is set aside and the matter is remitted to the Executing Court for consideration in the light of directions made above. The issue of whether arrest will be made or not will be taken subsequent to the adjudication as directed above. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE February 19, 2016 Pankaj* PANKAJ KUMAR 2016.02.23 12:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document