Rohit Sabharwal v. Jaskiran Singh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 918 of 2017 (O&M) Date of decision : 4.12.2018 Rohit Sabharwal ..Petitioner versus Jaskiran Singh and another .. Respondents Coram:

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur

Present:

Mr. Sardavinder Goyal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. G.S.Ghuman, Advocate for Mr. Ashok Kumar Bazaz, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. G.S. Attariwala, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) Status report in compliance of the order dated 24.8.2018 by way of affidavit of Vijay Kumar, Assistant Town Planner, Municipal Corporation, Ludhiana dated 3.12.2018 has been filed stating therein that in the past vide policy instructions dated 18.3.1998, the Government has allowed the compounding of shop-cum-flat into shop-cum-office situated in the development schemes of the Improvement Trusts and now compounding is to be considered subject to charging of the prevalent rate of composition fee. Accordingly, needful shall be done after receipt of the government approval, in accordance with law.

In view of the above, the present contempt is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to take action in accordance with law. Rule issued to the respondents stands discharged. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 4.12.2018 sharmila Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No SHARMILA DEVI 2018.12.05 12:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document phhc