Vishal Malhotra v. Raj Kumar
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND
HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.1210 of 2012 Date of Decision.12.07.2016 Vishal Malhotra son of Vimal Kumar Malhotra .......Petitioner Vs.
Raj Kumar ........Respondent
Present:
Mr. Ashish Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. S.S. Rangi, Advocate for the respondent.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL 1.
Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?
2.
To be referred to the Reporters or not ?
3.
Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- AMIT RAWAL J. (ORAL) The decree qua arrears of rent is to the tune of `21,624/- with interest @6% per annum. As per the amended provisions of Civil Procedure Code, no appeal lies. The revision petition against the decree is not maintainable and the party cannot be permitted to circumvent the statutory provisions to file the revision petition.
There is no ground for interference. In view of the aforementioned, the revision petition is not maintainable and accordingly, dismissed.
(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE July 12, 2016 Pankaj* PANKAJ KUMAR 2016.07.14 11:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document