Farukh And Others v. Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH COCP No.967 of 2017 Date of decision: 07.07.2017 Farukh and another ..Petitioners
Versus
Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma, D.C. Palwal ..Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
Present:
Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for Mr. Ashok Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Siddharth Sanwaria, DAG, Haryana for the respondent.
*** Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral) Learned State counsel submits that the order passed by this Court on 28.11.2016 in CWP No.24467 of 2016 has been complied with as the claim of the petitioner has been considered and rejected. Since the compliance of the order has been made but undisputedly there is delay. Accordingly, a cost of `10,000/- is imposed upon the respondent for not complying with the order within the stipulated period, which shall be paid by the officer/official from his own pocket, who was instrument in delaying the matter.
The costs amount be paid to the petitioner within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, which shall be shared equally by both the petitioners. Neetu Rani 2017.07.12 12:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
COCP No.967 of 2017 Disposed of accordingly.
However, the petitioners are at liberty to avail the appropriate remedy, if aggrieved in any manner.
07.07.2017 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) neetu JUDGE √ Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No √ Whether Reportable Yes/No Neetu Rani 2017.07.12 12:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh