← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/1711/2024disposed of

Dhruv Kumar Garg v. State Of Punjab

2025-07-24Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal2 pages

CRM-M-1711 of 2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH 225-1 CRM-M-1711 of 2024 Date of decision: 24.07.2025 Dhruv Kumar Garg

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE 

Present:

Mr. P. S. Ahluwalia, Advocate, and Ms. Bhavi Kapur, Advocate, for the petitioner.  

       

 



 **** 

 , J. (Oral) 1.

The petitioner is seeking regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. 1973 in case FIR No.215 dated 04.07.2022 under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of IPC, registered at Police Station Civil Lines, District Amritsar.

2.

Vide order dated 04.03.2024, petitioner was ordered to be released on interim bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits after releasing the petitioner on interim bail, the bank has already auctioned his house and he is having only a residential house and proceedings as per law are still in progress. The petitioner has undergone for a period of 5 months and 20 days. He further submits that petitioner has not misused the concession of interim bail granted to him and he is willing to join each and every date of proceedings.

3.

Learned State counsel submits that after releasing him on bail, petitioner has joined almost all the proceedings before the trial Court and he ANIL KUMAR 2025.07.29 19:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-1711 of 2024 has not misused the concession of interim bail. He has filed the custody certificate in the Court today, which is taken on record. As per custody certificate, the petitioner is in custody for the last 5 months and 20 days. 4.

Learned counsel for the complainant has vehemently oppose the prayer for grant of regular bail to the petitioner as amount of Rs.2,11,00,000/- is still outstanding towards the petitioner and co-accused. 5.

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

6.

In view of the above submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner and considering custody period undergone by the petitioner and the undertaking that he will join all the proceedings before the trial Court, the order dated 04.03.2024 granting him interim bail is made absolute. 7.

In the light of the above, the present petition is disposed of accordingly. However, the petitioner shall consider the offer made by Bank for One Time Settlement.

8.

However, it is made clear that in case the petitioner misuses the concession of bail, the State would be at liberty to seek cancellation of their bail.

( ) 

 24.07.2025 anil Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes / No Whether reportable :

Yes / No ANIL KUMAR 2025.07.29 19:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document