Amita Garg v. Atul Garg Etc.

C.R. No.1476 of 2016 -1IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.1476 of 2016 Date of Decision.01.03.2016 Amita Garg .......Petitioner Vs.

Sh. Atul Garg and others ........Respondents

Present:

Mr. A.K. Khunger, Advocate for Mr. R.K. Singla, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Anju Arora, Advocate for respondent No.1.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) 1.

A persistent claim for injunction is meaningless when very same subject matter was brought before this Court in C.R. No.1325 of 2016 on 23.02.2016 and I have declined the relief of injunction. The additional point which is now canvassed is that the petitioner had been married to respondent No.1 even in the year 2009 which is against the marriage certificate which is filed before the court that shows that the marriage took place only in the year 2011 at Arya Samaj Mandir, Sector 15, Faridabad.

2.

There is simply no merit in the revision petition. The revision petition is dismissed.

(K. KANNAN) JUDGE March 01, 2016 Pankaj* PANKAJ KUMAR 2016.03.03 12:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document