Guljinder Singh v. State Of Haryana













 

 



 

 !"#"$%
 

&'("$) *
+"$,-















 ""$ * . *#&# + 

 */ $ $)
- *#










#0$) $#

1
%
 23
1 
 + 
+
   


 
 

  

+
 5

6

37 Present writ petition has been filed for staying the operation and implementation of Sanad Takseem dated 04.07.2023 (Annexure P-1) during the pendency of ROR No.342 of 2023 with stay application dated 12.12.2023 (Annexure P-2) till the decision of stay application/ROR as the matter has been adjourned for 05.03.2024 straightway without hearing the stay application whereas the matter is of urgent nature and if the stay has not been granted then the petitioners will suffer an irreparable loss and injury as the warrants of possession has been issued.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that inadvertently respondent No.1 i.e. the State of Haryana has been impleaded in this case through the Financial Commissioner-cumPrincipal Secretary, however the same should be done through the Divisional Commissioner, Karnal. He submits that the necessary

88 % %

99
correction may kindly be made on his oral request and the same be read as the Divisional Commissioner, Karnal.

Keeping in view the request made by learned counsel for the petitioner and keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, the necessary correction is allowed to be done and respondent No.1 now be read as State of Haryana through the Divisional Commissioner, Karnal.

Registry is directed to carry out the necessary correction in the memo of parties.

It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has filed the revision petition being ROR No.342 of 2023, which is pending adjudication before the Divisional Commissioner, Karnal. He submits that now the revision petition has been fixed for hearing along with the stay application on 05.03.2024. He submits that during the pendency of the same, warrants of possession have already been issued and the date is fixed for submitting the compliance report on 18.01.2024. He submits that if the possession is taken without hearing the stay application filed by the petitioner, the petitioner would be seriously prejudiced.

Notice of motion to the official respondents at this stage. On asking of the Court, 

 
   



 

!"


# $

%



& 



 

&! 



 '

 
!


 "
(  

%) *$ %*%+

% %

99 ,
 
"
&"


 

& 
 





 
  
 "
!

   "




"

 

 



  
!
&
-&
"
&"


  
 &! 




 '

*.

*) %*%+
 
"
 &"

&! 




 '

%) *$ %*%+

/
 


  
!


  
 




  


# $




 "

(  
0"
!


 
  

 
 


"

 
 "
!

  
"



    

 



 
!

 



 "
'  &"

- ""


 



 
 $1 $% %*%)
&"
 

! 























6 +
 7














   

 2


3

43# 2
!"

43#