Gram Panchayat Phangarian Th Its Sarpanch v. Kishan Chand And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH C.R. No.1553 of 2016 (O&M) Date of Decision.29.02.2016 Gram Panchayat, Phangarian .......Petitioner Vs.

Kishan Chand and another ........Respondents

Present:

Mr. Dheeraj Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) 1.

The Gram Panchayat is aggrieved about the nature of injunction granted by the Court below. Its contention is that the injunction must have been restricted only to the protection against eviction except in due course of law since the plaintiff himself has pleaded that the property belonged to the Gram Panchayat. 2.

Interim order of injunction must be understood that the injunction shall operate till he is duly evicted in due course of law. The plaintiff shall not be entitled to plead that interim order obtained will debar the Gram Panchayat from taking action for eviction in accordance with law. I do not think a notice is necessary, for I am merely stating an obvious in the light of the contentions made by the plaintiff himself admitting the Gram Panchayat to be the owner. The impugned order is clarified to operate in the manner referred to above. The revision petition is disposed of.

(K. KANNAN) JUDGE February 29, 2016 Pankaj* PANKAJ KUMAR 2016.03.03 12:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document